I welcome your feedback

"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg) 11/13/2017 at 18:21 • Filed to: None

1

9

I tried to improve the timing of the sound/clips a bit from my !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! .

Urambo Tauro > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/13/2017 at 19:08

1

pip bip - choose Corrour > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/14/2017 at 05:54

1

seems alright to me.

HammerheadFistpunch > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/14/2017 at 12:13

2

my 2 cents for further productions? Skip the intro or trim it to absolute mins. no more than 10-15 seconds. An overly long intro has been shown to skunk otherwise interesting Youtube videos on account of people tuning out before the meat of the video. Otherwise very nice.

Future next gen S2000 owner > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/14/2017 at 12:43

0

Where is the mountain road at 1:45?

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > HammerheadFistpunch 11/14/2017 at 12:59

0

Fair point. Public attention span is probably not down for a 3.5 minute video, esp. with the “welcome to the Big O” section as long as it is.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Future next gen S2000 owner 11/14/2017 at 12:59

0

Mt. Evans, Idaho Springs, CO

HammerheadFistpunch > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/14/2017 at 13:00

1

People enjoy these kinds of videos, but they want to get right into it.

Future next gen S2000 owner > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/14/2017 at 13:13

1

That’s what I thought. Fun road.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Future next gen S2000 owner 11/14/2017 at 13:44

0

Indeed